Animal Welfare VS
is a philosophical view that puts animals on the same moral plane as
humans and rejects the use of animals for any reason whatsoever.
Amongst the long-term goals of the
movement are the
total ban of all forms of commercial animal agriculture, medical or
veterinary research, zoos (regardless of how well managed), the end
of hunting, shooting, horse riding and racing, rodeos, show jumping,
zoos, circuses, guide dogs for the blind,
the keeping of pets,
the production of silk, wool and honey and the abolition of fishing.
On the whole animal charities do fantastic work so please don't feel I am against them because I'm not, I simply wish them to look at and review their current methods to make them more aware of everyone and everything involved before rushing to take it to court. A year ago a breeder who has helped me on on many occasions had her dogs taken by the RSPCA. This came as a surprise to me as I had always known her to spend every penny she had on her dogs. That set me looking into animal rights organisations such as Peta who openly advertise t-shirts with "Bite the Breeder" on them! Peta quotes when referring to animals "they are not ours to use – for food, clothing, entertainment, experimentation or any other reason" that includes as pets!
I also discovered many animal rights orientated people have silently become part of more acceptable animal organisations and this is changing the direction of organisations we have known and trusted without question for many years. The breeder concerned had her case dropped in the end because of lack of evidence in which case why did this go to court at all? Essentially she had some really old dogs some of which had bad teeth. How many old dogs do you know that don't have a few bad teeth and surely the correct course of action from the RSPCA should have been to help and guide in this issue, not seriously upset the dogs by taking them into care. When the dogs were returned a year later they were returned with various medications. Why after a year in apparently expert care did they still need further drugs? Were they not well looked after in that year away from their owner? The drugs were issued only a day before the dogs were returned to their owner which suggests that was the time a vet actually checked them out - why not earlier and on a regular basis? One dog 17 years old died shortly after returning home - he just waited to come home and get on his favourite sofa by the fire before he could die - how appallingly sad is that. No justification I know could ever justify what was done as quite simply it should never have gone to court. There are however sadly many many cases that do deserve everything that happens
BUT and this is the point I'm making, not all! My belief is the only fair way to deal with all cases concerning cruelty is that they should be passed by the crown prosecution service (as any other criminal action is) to ensure the case is worth while and in the public interest as the RSPCA have to do in Scotland. This does not currently happen in the UK so for example a vet who is animal rights orientated could very easily persuade the RSPCA to take it to court without anyone else looking into the details or there really being any real proof!
All animal rights people and much of the RSPCA are anti Kennel Club and pedigree dogs yet they make up only a tiny minority of the dogs in the UK but are still being held responsible by these people for it all. Much has been said about crossbreed dogs being better than pedigree dogs so look at this simply. If health problems are being bred out of pedigree dogs, crossbreed dogs are simply breeding it in. For example a Dachshund with PRA bred to a Alsatian with hip dysplasia would then produce a dog with both those genetic health problems instead of two breeds with only one. Only by selective breeding can these health issues be bred out and that is a fact rather than an emotional outburst from animal rights motivated people. Much work is being carried out to change breed standards to breed out health issues due to shape and this will continue until there are no issues left, but remember we got to this point in hundreds of years before anyone was even aware of health issues so it won't be so quick to undo.
Far too many people complain about bad and terrible breeders yet they buy from those very same breeders and then crow on social media to all their friends how good they are for rescuing another dog from such a terrible breeder that just happens to be, exactly the colour and type they were looking for. So how exactly is that morally right?
The Kennel Club is trying extremely hard with its assured breeders scheme to significantly raise the bar for dog breeding.
So please buy from breeders trying to actively improve matters not the back street one just because she has the colour you want. As of January 2014 assured breeders are inspected to UKAS certified standard once every three years simply because of cost and resources available. Personally I would welcome it once a year along with spot checks and that is where it will ultimately get to. It isn't perfect but its getting there and that needs to be encouraged. Buy from assured breeders only and you will soon put the others out of business as well as being guaranteed the assured breeders are doing everything to the very highest standards. Find an assured breeder who isn't and you can and should report them and have them removed!
We are so concerned at the way dogs are currently so easily taken from owners that we made a film to highlight just how easily! While the story of JAILHOUSE DOG is entirely fictional as are the characters it may surprise you to learn that the majority of the events concerning animals shown in the film although taken out of their original context are true as are many of the powers used. The gap between animal welfare and animal rights has over the last ten years or so quietly widened to the point where it is now a very worrying difference seriously impacting on peoples rights. We hope this film while for your entertainment primarily will also stimulate enthusiastic debate on just how much people's rights can or should be ignored and abused in favour of animal rights.
Please help us to get the message out and share this film far and wide as this issue is a world wide issue. To share move your mouse over the top right hand section of the video and you will see a paper aeroplane please click on this to share via facebook, twitter and email.
If you think what happens in the film is not happening then please take a look at these links:
RSPCA prosecuting too many vulnerable people
Is the RSPCA jeopardising its animal welfare role by prosecuting too many vulnerable people? Is the charity harassing experts who speak up against it? John Waite investigates.
In January of this year, Melissa Kite wrote our cover story about how the RSPCA has morphed from being an animal welfare charity into an ...
RSPCA made us feel like criminals
Imagine what would happen if J. Edgar Hoover, founder of the FBI, were running the RSPCA
RSPCA Inspector commits suicide
RSPCA prefers profit over principle
Police, RSPCA and firemen turn up mob-handed to seize vet,70
is it the RSPCA "just a charity" has so much power yet no one appears to know
how they got it?
RSPCA is using a sensitive police database nearly 1,500 times a year under a
deal giving it privileged access to criminal records
A woman known as the “Owl Lady” is being prosecuted by the RSPCA amid allegations she hoarded exotic birds in her seaside basement flat.
The Telegraph can disclose that police forces have agreed to give RSPCA inspectors access to the information under a under a series of ...
Archbishop declines role of RSPCA vice patron
In the past two years the number of convictions the RSPCA has secured has almost doubled, despite no increase in calls to its cruelty telephone hotline.
A vet from Fakenham claims he became the victim of an RSPCA smear campaign after he gave expert evidence against the animal welfare charity in court